<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Kevin,<BR>
<BR>
What kind of errors on which options ? so that i can check my work, i use only seabios with coreboot and at the moment only with the defaults. But i'm ready to experiment with different options on seabios, due that my machine does not have keyboard, mouse, video, floppy or printer port. So therefore I need to make some different build either of seabios.<BR>
<BR>
And yes always a good idea to check the latest version, i just needed a version that worked and was quickly available that's why i take the coreboot version, i did known of any differences.<BR>
<BR>
Marc <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 12:58 -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> can check what i'm doing is correct, at least to my opinion :-)</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Hi Marc,</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Your patch doesn't look complete. I get build failures when trying</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">different build options and when selecting different configuration</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">options.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">Also, I think pulling kconfig from the latest linux source would be</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">preferable to pulling from coreboot. There seems to be a number of</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">improvements in the linux version of kconfig. If I get time I'll look</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">at doing this.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">-Kevin</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>